10/23/09
51.5” wide, 33” high, 167” deep
Antenna weight: 10 lb.
The Winegard literature is
correct: The antenna is for channels 7-69.
So this antenna was obsolete on June 12.
In every other respect this seems like a good antenna. But throwing away 2 dB for a short-lived
market advantage seems silly to me.
The antenna has a
combiner/balun that employs a ferrite transformer balun. Just from looking at it I would say it might
be especially low loss for a transformer balun.
But presently I have no way to measure the loss in such devices.
This antenna has no useful
reception for channel 2-6. The UHF part
of the antenna is 86 inches long.
This page is part of “An HDTV Primer”, which
starts at www.hdtvprimer.com